I'll let you come in and answer the others in a second, but let me give you one example. The bill states:
For greater certainty, it does not include lawful advocacy, protest, dissent and artistic expression.
That same clause was in the 2001 bill. I was one of the ones inside caucus opposing that clause. We amended it out.
Do any of you, the promoters of the bill, Mr. Mansur or Mr. Davies, feel that if we took the word “lawful” out it would impact on this bill in any way to do the job it's intended to do?