In answer to that, I would begin by saying that we have to have trust in our law enforcement people. You can speculate that a rogue enforcement officer might go beyond his jurisdiction for mischief. You can't guard against the odd black sheep. But taken as a whole, I'm satisfied that the agencies will act in good faith, that citizens who are not validly under suspicion will not have some manufactured reason for their private lives to be interfered with.
You can exaggerate, as I commented in that letter you referred to, or you can speculate on rogues doing a lot of things, but the history of Canada and our law enforcement is generally that the people involved in law enforcement, involved in Parliament, involved in the governance of the country, have acted responsibly. What we have to try to do is ensure that there are reasonable safeguards to continue that.
For that reason, I come back to the review at the end of these things: the national security adviser. I said earlier there's a lot of protection at the beginning—you have to get warrants—but there's nothing at the end to see whether the warrant was followed.