I can't underscore how important that is because it is suicidal for our governments in the west to say that just because they don't target an individual, the advocacy of acts of terror against Canadians or Canada is so generic that it's protected speech. That is fuel. The reason you're getting pushback from Islamist groups is because once your government and our government, our intelligence operation, starts to focus on that, all of a sudden you're going to start to look at where this come from. What are they preaching at the mosque or at the Islamic organization that fuels this?
They're going to start to ask questions, versus the mantra that the violent radicals are somehow psychiatrically ill and come out of nowhere. They're not coming out of nowhere. I think that ultimately this is why you're getting obstacles. Every Muslim I know would want legislation that protects free speech but defeats speech that promotes terrorism. Because we don't want that in our mosques and I don't think we want it in our Muslim organizations or on our Internet affecting my children or any of the Muslim kids, because they will be susceptible to radicalization through that Islamo-patriotic movement. I think ultimately it's very important to start shedding the light of day upon those ideas that advocate and apologize for terrorism, because if you're not looking in those pools where the terrorists float, you can't drain them and ultimately keep your country safe.