Let me start with the CLC.
You said the bill is reckless, and I don't disagree that there are some terribly serious gaps in this bill that need to be amended.
We've heard from a lot of witnesses, and as your two co-witnesses tonight have suggested, most witnesses before the committee—and there are exceptions—have had a concern and believe there's a need on the public safety and national security side for some of the aspects of the bill. But generally most of the witnesses have also had some concerns about civil liberties, freedom of expression, and overreach on the part of the bill in a number of areas. I would say that has been the general tenor of the witnesses thus far.
From the perspective of the CLC, if the political will were there to make changes, to make amendments to this bill, do you think it would be fixable, or are you just completely opposed to it?