The chair would do that, but the chair would also acknowledge that the witness has an opportunity to respond to previous testimony that has been given relative either to statements he made or did not make. But I would certainly encourage the witness to try to stay as close as possible to Bill C-51, with regard to the purpose and intent of the bill, obviously. But you certainly have the right to defend yourself against allegations and/or improprieties, as you deem fit, that would cast either a negative or positive light on testimony that has been given at this committee.
So, carry on, sir.