Thank you, Mr. Chair.
This amendment also falls on the next page. We're at page 27 where we find ourselves in the definitions.
Again, it's strange, bizarre, and unknown language for defining terrorist propaganda, using this notion of “commission of terrorism offences in general”. This amendment attempts to tighten the language and make sure we don't create a situation where people cannot even speak to someone who may become interested in joining a criminal organization.
I want to tighten the language to avoid the use of the phrase “terrorism in general” and add (a) through (d) and then (e) to ensure that we are actually able to prescribe the right rules to deal with terrorist propaganda that actually incites violence and tries to persuade people to be involved in it, as opposed to a wide array of other communications, for instance, even relating to incidents of the past. The way it's drafted now, I'm not sure that an old poster of Che Guevara won't be considered terrorist propaganda.