Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Mrs. Doré Lefebvre's analysis of this amendment is not accurate. It's not just one little change, which I don't agree with. They're suggesting changing the word “interference” to “sabotage”. I think some things are best addressed by nipping them in the bud, and changing it to actual “sabotage” does not allow it to do that.
But there is a second part to their amendment, which the NDP did not mention, and that's changing the “for greater certainty” clause in the bill. I think the change proposed by the separatist party is divisive in nature, and I can't support it.