Mr. Chair, I have one other point. I want to come back to Mr. Duffy again, if I can, or the other witnesses.
What gets confusing here, Mr. Duffy, if you go to new subsection 12.1(3), is that it states that the service may not take measures that contravene a right, etc., or will be contrary to other Canadian law unless—and these are the words that are troublesome—“the Service is authorized to take them by a warrant issued under section 21.1.”
I'm not a lawyer, but when that's in there with the words “unless the service is authorized...by warrant”, the first thing that pops into your mind is that they would be authorized to contravene that right or freedom. That's the problem I have with this wording.
I don't question what you said previously, but can you expand on that a little further? Because that's my reading of it.