That's not an activity which I've partaken in. Having said that, the example of the paintball guns points to the absurdity of the current situation if this court decision were allowed, if it wasn't amended by my private member's bill. It's clearly ridiculous to have to lock up these devices and store the paintballs in a different place, and trigger locks, the whole nine yards.
Again, for the committee, this is a fairly minor bill. It's a technical amendment to correct a decision by an appellate judge that we think was clearly wrong. The paintball situation, if this was allowed to stand, is the perfect example of why we need my private member's bill.