That makes sense.
I will admit, as you were explaining the IIO, to thinking that this was more duplication of another review body that would cost the system more money. On the other hand, when you made this point on investigations being faster, I was thinking that maybe there was a benefit to reducing the overall cost of the system. I will admit I'm betwixt and between here.
You also mentioned that in an investigation the IIO would look at the use of force—I think those were your words—and the police would look at the incident of assault.
How eventually do the two bodies, if I can put it that way, combine those two investigations to get an end result?