That's exactly right. Proportionality would mostly come into play when a judge is considering the justifiability or whether taking a certain action is justifiable under the charter.
In the context of the bill before us today, a judge would mostly look at whether the decision of the government is reasonable and therefore whether it can objectively be based on certain facts: with the facts before them, was it reasonable in the circumstances to take away the passports?
Reasonableness is the most important test. Proportionality comes into play when you're looking at the objective behind the passport order and the actions being taken by government.