Thank you very much.
I know that we've heard reference this morning to the 10 youth in Montreal who were prevented from leaving the country. It raises the question, for me, of whether this provision is actually needed or whether the existing provisions, which obviously stopped them from leaving the country, are adequate. Does this example illustrate that there's a gap, or does it illustrate that what we have is actually effective? We have some concern about creating two different entities within government that can both cancel passports. Who would be responsible for what in terms of cancellation?
Going back to the example in Montreal, wouldn't this illustrate that we already have this power in Canada and has been very effectively used? I put that to Mr. Leuprecht, please.