You've offered numbers, and there have been a few references to the 2016-17 annual report of the Office of the Correctional Investigator. I think, for the record, you might want to go back and look at this particular document. Just to put it on the record, I'm going to quote from the Library of Parliament's document that it has provided. It's obviously a very objective source of information.
It says that the Office of the Correctional Investigator:
reviewed [over 3,500] incident reports between February 2015 and April 2017 and found that “approximately 25% of these incidents showed a positive hit on the ion scanner.” The OCI added that the “refusal rates for visits due to positive ion scanner tests were about 18%.”
That is right from the document.
I wanted to put that to you, because we've heard the number 25% cited and 18% cited. Just so there's no confusion, if you want to go back and look, it is on the record now and you know where to look.