When you're talking about frisk searching, for instance, that still is a superficial search, and it's not the most effective measure to understand whether or not somebody may be in possession of a narcotic, for instance. Under those circumstances, if we're talking about trying to prevent narcotics from entering an institution, it's a far less effective means, from our perspective, in terms of preventing those individuals from getting it in, as opposed to essentially something that's objective and calculates things the same way each time. If we removed the ion scanning, it's not as effective a measure to frisk search somebody as an actual scan through the device.
Ultimately what we can expect is probably increased amounts of narcotics in our institutions, and it also serves as a deterrent to the effect that people are concerned about bringing narcotics in—obviously visitors—when they know they have to defeat that device. If we took that away and it was a device that they didn't have to defeat, then there is the possibility that a number of visitors who come to our institutions would try to smuggle narcotics in.