My understanding in the CRCC context is that it's well understood. It's a back and forth with the police agency and the CRCC. It's not a one-way decision. There's information exchanged and the threshold is met. If the police unilaterally had that ability to shut down complaints, that may cause a concern as well.
If it's working well now under existing law, and it's clear that it is a discussion to get to that opinion, and obviously the police would have an incentive to ensure enough information was exchanged to help to get them to that opinion, if it were necessary, then that is the spirit in which it was drafted.