Pam Damoff at the Public Safety and National Security Committee

On April 17th, 2018. See this statement in context.

April 17th, 2018 / noon

Liberal

Pam Damoff Liberal Oakville North—Burlington, ON

I have a question for the clerk.

If you look at CPC-10, Mr. Paul-Hus is exactly correct. It says “et”. It doesn't say “mais”. So, if “mais” actually includes the word “and” as well, then CPC-10 is wrong. I'm wondering if, in LIB-5, we could amend the French version to say:

“de la preuve et sous réserve de la”?

Could we change “mais” to “et”?

See context to find out what was said next.