I will need explanations, as this seems contradictory to me.
The review agency would have a mandate to oversee the operations of other agencies, but, through this amendment, it will be told to forget about its oversight so as not to harm operations. However, oversight is the agency's primary goal if it is doing its job properly. In order to harm an investigation under way, it would have to intervene. Of course, the review agency's work is not to intervene on the ground and harm an operation, but if its mandate to oversee other agencies is removed, it would be as if those agencies were left to do what they want.
I don't understand this amendment's objective. Perhaps the officials could explain it to me. It seems to me that this is about taking away the agency's authority for unknown reasons.
Please give me a concrete example.