I'm looking at that in light of, as well, LIB-30, that looks at adding that expressed trigger around reasonable expectation of privacy, that element of when we acquire information, it could interfere with the expectation of privacy that would be included within the ministerial authorization. The only thing I would say there is that the spirit of clause 27 is certainly consistent with the charter statement around publicly available information being a low impact from a privacy perspective. I have no idea, as I'm not a legal expert, that by having that in the “publicly available information” definition, and should LIB-30 pass, whether having that in both places does an interpretation thing or not. But at the end of the day it does reflect the fact that this information has a low reasonable expectation of privacy, or that is the intent. Again, it's around ensuring the review agency will know that we are not directing our activities at Canadians when we do this stuff, so it won't really change the information collection side.
On April 23rd, 2018. See this statement in context.