Mr. Chair, I would like to solicit some advice from the officials here. I think the logic is that the charter itself is triggered, engaged, or infringed all the time, but often it's upheld as being a reasonable step under section 1. I think that's what the discussion is getting at. How do we capture the language that will be clear enough to give confidence to the Canadian public that their charter rights are protected? I think that should be the essence of our question.
On April 23rd, 2018. See this statement in context.