Again, it's only there for the extenuating circumstances.
The way the intelligence commissioner's role is laid out in part 2 of the act is that it is reviewing the minister's decision before CSE can undertake the activity. If we can't undertake that activity because the intelligence commissioner is unavailable and there's an emergency occurring, then there's a challenge around that.
The role of the intelligence commissioner is to review that authorization before CSE proceeds. This allows us to proceed under extenuating circumstances without that review. To Charlie's point, that's is coherent with the structure of part 2.