Evidence of meeting #108 for Public Safety and National Security in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was debate.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

John Davies  Director General, National Security Policy, Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
Sophie Beecher  Director of Intelligence Policy, National and Cyber Security Branch, Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
Ari Slatkoff  General Counsel, Department of Justice
Douglas Breithaupt  Director and General Counsel, Criminal Law Policy Section, Department of Justice
Glenn Gilmour  Counsel, Criminal Law Policy Section, Department of Justice

9:35 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Paul-Hus Conservative Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles, QC

Mr. Chair, I would like a recorded vote, please.

9:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

We will have a recorded vote.

(Amendment negatived: nays 6; yeas 2 [See Minutes of Proceedings])

Therefore, I declare CPC-27, CPC-28, and CPC-29 defeated.

We are now on to clauses 159 through 167. Do I have permission to group them for the vote?

9:35 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

9:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

(Clauses 159 to 167 inclusive agreed to on division)

(On clause 168)

We are now on to NDP-108.

9:35 p.m.

NDP

Matthew Dubé NDP Beloeil—Chambly, QC

Thank you, Chair.

I'm moving—and I can't believe it—my final amendment.

9:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

Oh, my goodness.

9:35 p.m.

NDP

Matthew Dubé NDP Beloeil—Chambly, QC

This amendment follows on the suggestions of several witnesses we heard from, including Professor Wark, Professor Roach, and the International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group, which all suggested shortening the review period for the legislation, and that it should be commenced in the fourth year after the act has passed and completed by the fifth.

9:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

Thank you, Mr. Dubé.

Members should also know that if NDP-108 is adopted, PV-46 cannot be adopted. We've observed the custom of having Ms. May speak to her amendment at the same time.

Do you wish to speak to your amendment, Ms. May?

9:40 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Yes. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

It's not just custom. I hate to be a stickler, but there is that motion you passed that requires me to be here.

9:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

I know, I personally passed it.

9:40 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

The committee passed it, and we all know that it's just a random coincidence that the same language was passed by every committee, because a committee is the master of its own procedures.

All I will say is that my motion is identical to that of Mr. Dubé. It is to have a more timely review of four years and not six. I'll just say, if you'll forgive me one little moment, that on January 30, 2015, a Friday, Bill C-51 was dropped for first reading. I took it home with me on the airplane and read it, and I came back to Parliament on the Monday and said, “This is the secret police act and we have to stop it.”

I am grateful for the many changes that are being made here today. I wish we could have made more, but remaining vigilant to make those changes, I'd like to see the review period set at four years instead of six.

Thank you very much.

9:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

Is there any debate? I see none.

(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings])

Do you wish to make any other observations on PV-46?

9:40 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

No, except to say thank you. I know it's not your personal fault that the motion was passed by the committee. Do take it to the higher-ups some day.

9:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

Those in favour of PV-46...?

(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings])

(Clause 168 agreed to on division)

(Clause 169 agreed to on division)

We're on amendment LIB-54.

9:40 p.m.

Liberal

Peter Fragiskatos Liberal London North Centre, ON

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

This amendment establishes that the proposed avoiding complicity in mistreatment by foreign entities act would come into force on a day to be fixed by the Governor in Council. This allows the government time to prepare to meet the requirements of the new act before it comes into force by, for instance, preparing the required direction.

9:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

Mr. Dubé.

9:40 p.m.

NDP

Matthew Dubé NDP Beloeil—Chambly, QC

Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.

I'd say that in continuing to prove the problems with an amendment that's incomplete, I think the.... It will come into force as soon as the bill is adopted, so I will be voting against this amendment.

9:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

Is there further debate?

(Amendment agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])

(Clauses 170 to 173 inclusive agreed to on division)

Shall the schedule carry?

9:40 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

9:40 p.m.

An hon. member

On division.

9:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

Shall the short title carry?

9:40 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

9:40 p.m.

NDP

Matthew Dubé NDP Beloeil—Chambly, QC

On division.

9:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

We're getting there.

We're on amendment LIB-55.

Mr. Picard, you apparently are quite anxious to move it.

April 25th, 2018 / 9:40 p.m.

Liberal

Michel Picard Liberal Montarville, QC

A little bit, yes.

Since the whole Bill C-59 is looking at improving our national security framework and legislation, I think we should encourage the international community to do the same. I move that the preamble be amended by adding after line 12 on page 1 the following:

Whereas the Government of Canada, by carrying out its national security and information activities in a manner that respects rights and freedoms, encourages the international community to do the same;