With respect to the classification issue, one of the things that speaks to me is...I'm a big believer in making sure, whenever there is a discretionary power for a government or an agency, that the public understands why that discretionary power was exercised. A constituent raised specifically with me the fact that he's uneasy with both the RCMP and Parliament making the classification. I don't know who the best positioned person would be. Whoever it is, in my mind, should have some kind of a duty to explain why they've exercised their discretion.
Is there any safety risk that would come with requiring the RCMP to explain why they've classified a particular firearm in a particular way?