Thank you very much.
Finally, with respect to classification, I do know that sometimes parliamentarians are inclined towards knee-jerk reactions. In fact, sometimes they're rewarded for it, whether it's responding to an incident in another part of the world or potentially responding to the needs of a lobby organization.
I'm curious. If the RCMP are going to be in charge of the classification decisions, is there anything preventing them from releasing reasons in the interests of transparency as to why a particular firearm is classified a particular way?