Indeed, the part related to Thierry's death that concerns background, that is to say the part that extends to the individual's entire life and any background of violence, family violence and other elements like mental illness, is a step forward.
However, we are not taking into account what happens between the new request, the moment when the permit is issued, and its renewal five years later.
If, for some reason or another, an individual manages to get through the net and obtains a permit, there is nothing to stop you from implementing the systematic withdrawal of permits following an episode of family violence. Withdrawing firearms and weapons in those cases is optional. It's not mandatory, but that option can be considered if the firearms owner has a record of family violence.
As it is currently worded, the bill would not have prevented Thierry's death, nor that of several other police officers, despite the amendment. I am aware that it is a small step forward, but it is not enough. It would not have prevented Thierry's death. Mr. Papatie would have had access to his weapons.