Notwithstanding the litany of things that you went through, and I certainly appreciate the fact that I think you're bang-on, on a wide number of those, especially the duty to consult. I don't want to talk about the duty to consult right now.
During the testimony from various witnesses before this committee, some of the members of this committee have used props. They have held up pictures of firearms that would be a semi-automatic .223 that could easily have a wooden stock and a hunting scope on it and still work the same way as another firearm. They have also held up some pictures of firearms that are bolt-action long-distance rifles that could be potentially used for hunting. I asked questions about various other calibres.
Are you aware that the appearance of a firearm, even if it happens to be a bolt-action firearm that might hold four rounds, is actually under scrutiny as something that could be or should be reclassified as a prohibited firearm in Canada? How would that make the hunters in the Assembly of First Nations feel?