I think that our comments were mostly focused on our understanding of how the process works in Ontario.
It's our understanding that the chief firearms officer can already go and look beyond five years. They can look for a lifetime. They're not necessarily limited in the criteria. When they do the risk assessments, they're actually looking at much more than what's narrowly defined in the current legislation.
I think that change in the legislation may not actually turn into a functional difference in what the chief firearms officer can do now.