Do people understand the amendment that he has proposed to his amendment CPC-4.01?
I know you'll be disappointed in my ruling, Mr. Motz, and I feel badly about that, but I don't feel so badly as to not tell you that the amendment you proposed, CPC-4.01, was referred to the committee after second reading, and it is out of order because it is beyond the scope and the principle of the bill.
It is the opinion of the chair that the firearms classification board introduces a new concept that is beyond the scope of the bill. Therefore, I am ruling it inadmissible.