Okay.
I have one more question about paragraph (d). The headline of this particular clause only goes back five years, and the new addition under (d) reads:
is or was previously prohibited by an order - made in the interests of the safety and security of any person - from communicating with an identified person or from being at a specified place or within a specified distance of that place;
It's a PO, a prohibition order, right? Is that only going to go back to POs that are less than five years old, or is it going to go back to POs that are from 20 years ago?
Because of the way the headline of this clause of the bill is, and given the fact that there is discretion from the CFO to go back as far as they want to in certain circumstances, how do you expect that to be interpreted and implemented by the CFO, should this law pass?