Would anyone like to comment? I think we have had much discussion about this, but we're just going to do clause 40. That's what you're going to tell me; I can feel you doing that.
What I would like to do, then, now is ask—and I get the right wording—shall clause 40 carry?
(Clause 40 negatived)
We'll do clause 41 now, and then we'll do clause 42.
Shall clause 41 carry?
(Clause 41 agreed to )
(On clause 42)
I suspect clause 42 has had the same discussion over several meetings.
Shall clause 42 carry?
(Clause 42 negatived)
(On clause 740)
You'll notice that if we skip through to the end of the bill, we have clause 74, which implicates what we have just done. We will now have to deal with clause 74 that says,
Sections 40 and 42 come into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council.
This is consequential, so I will then read into the record: seeing as clauses 40 and 42 have been defeated, clause 74 is also defeated as it is consequential to both these clauses.
(Clause 74 negatived)
Now we will vote. People are hungry.