Objectively or not objectively, it's a valid point that he did make earlier on about the time delay between translation from one language to the other language. I have some sympathy for that, so in the spirit of collegiality, you want a recorded vote on clause 5, which I suspect will have a similar outcome to the previous vote.
(Clause 5 as amended agreed to: yeas 6; nays 3)
(Clause 6 agreed to)
(On clause 7)
On amendment CPC-31, with the passage of amendment CPC-2, I am advised that amendment CPC-31 is now redundant because it essentially says the same thing. If CPC-31 is redundant, we go directly to amendment CPC-32.
Mr. Paul-Hus, on amendment CPC-32, go ahead, s'il vous plaît.