Is there any debate?
(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Amendment CPC-40 is apparently the same as amendment CPC-39, so amendment CPC-40 cannot be moved.
Amendment CPC-40.1 was reference number 9928789. We already made the original ruling back under CPC-15 that it was ruled out of order for vagueness.
(Clause 10 agreed to: yeas 6; nays 3 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
(Clause 11 agreed to on division [See Minutes of Proceedings])
There are no amendments to clause 12.
We're on amendment CPC-40.2, reference 9927639, in the name of Mr. Calkins.
I would just make the observation—I'm not going to rule against it—that there's, borderline, a scope issue, but beyond that, you've moved it and we'll let it stand.