Dr. Zinger, I want to circle back to the term “meaningful human contact”. It's UN language. It's a common denominator.
Is there value in this terminology, either through legislative interpretation, regulatory interpretation, or ultimately judicial interpretation? If so, can we use this term to take account particularly of vulnerable populations—in other words, a gender lens, a diversity lens, an indigenous lens, ethnic, religious backgrounds, disability? Can we get somewhere with this phrase “meaningful human contact”?