Of course.
That's our purpose, just as it is for all other parties.
Now let's talk about amendment PV-9.
This one is an attempt to respond to the word “appropriate”, which many witnesses, particularly Senator Kim Pate, found to be a very vague approach to drafting. As she noted, it does not provide any protections to individuals and will essentially leave it to the courts to set the standards.
My amendment—not to read it all out to you—replaces “appropriate” with “least restrictive” measures and adds a requirement to provide a living environment at the lowest security level required for public safety.