I don't want to too heavily belabour the point, but it goes on. I wasn't going to read out the whole section, because we'd be here for a while; it's a long one.
Proposed section 34 doesn't say only “no reasonable alternative”. It goes on to say, “and the Commissioner believes on reasonable grounds that”, and then it has enumerated grounds.
It's actually pretty clear in its wording, and none of this says “no available psychiatric services” as part of it. It's listed in proposed section 34. We need to understand that proposed section 32 sets out the general purpose of what they're doing, but the transfer is clear, is mandated and is listed in proposed section 34.