That would depend on the case. In some cases with the horse being out of the barn because the crime has been committed already, quite often very likely yes, and whether or not the ultimate crime has been committed, not always. There is a difference between broad-based money laundering schemes, for example, versus terrorist financing and the ultimate role of committing a terrorist act. I think that money laundering quite often is proceeds of crime, so the crime has been committed; whereas on the terrorist financing side it's proceeds for crime and hopefully we can play a role in preventing that.
On January 28th, 2019. See this statement in context.