Certainly. The cybersecurity centre I believe you're alluding to is what's going to be spun out of CSE eventually, and I think you have Scott Jones coming in after this to talk about it. When I've discussed this with the government, I've talked about the analogy with what the U.K. has done with the National Cyber Security Centre. I see, certainly from the submissions and from the various discussions that have been had around this new centre in Canada, that it's trying to mirror a lot of what the National Cyber Security Centre does in the U.K.
Just to give you some context, I mentioned earlier that education and information are two big key elements when it comes to cybersecurity. That's what the NCSC in the U.K. does very, very well. It helps to bridge that disconnect between the public and the private sector in terms of getting information across, but it also does it in a way that's accessible to anyone. It gives advice to you personally; it gives advice to small and medium enterprises, and it goes all the way to the high end. My understanding is that this new centre in Canada is going to mirror some of that functionality. If it can, particularly in that education and information sharing piece, then it will be an incredibly valuable tool in terms of helping us build our capacity and our resilience to cybersecurity threats.
However, the challenge is with what Dr. Leuprecht brought up just now, which is the idea of skills. In the U.K., the NCSC actually runs competitions as well. It gets, for example, young women to come and code, and that actually helps to bridge the gender gap. What I haven't seen clearly is some of these elements to address the questions that Dr. Leuprecht brought up about not only sharing information but also using that as a platform to build the required skills to continue to support the development of cybersecurity in Canada. It will be interesting to see how that develops.