Thanks.
Both of you have raised the administrative offences. It's complicated, because not everyone is in the position of the scenario that Ms. Finestone has drawn, but it's a compelling scenario.
It's a compelling story about why somebody might not have been able to be in court or might not have received notices and all of that, but that's certainly not the case for everyone who has those offences.
Do you have any idea whether there is a fine-tuned way? Say we went to an automatic process. Now we're on an automatic process and the first layer is easy. Post-1996, for everyone with just simple possession, it's gone. Then you have the people who have administrative offences related to that simple possession. It can't as easily work automatically at that point, because now we have other parts to look at, so I guess you need almost a secondary process.
Have you thought about that? How do we parse that out?