Evidence of meeting #34 for Public Safety and National Security in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was c-51.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Barrie Zwicker  As an Individual
Arthur Jefford  As an Individual
Jack Dodds  As an Individual
Margaret Rao  As an Individual
Steven Poulos  As an Individual
Adam Smith  As an Individual
Roberto De Luca  As an Individual
Brenda McPhail  As an Individual
Teri Degler  As an Individual
Matthew Currie  As an Individual
Fred Ernst  As an Individual
Ewa Infeld  As an Individual
Richard Hudler  As an Individual
Jens Porup  As an Individual
Sharly Chan  As an Individual
Peter Glen  As an Individual
Bernice Murray  As an Individual
Evan Light  As an Individual
Sharon Howarth  As an Individual
Set Shuter  As an Individual
Paul Dutton  As an Individual
Semret Seyoum  As an Individual
Ben Silver  As an Individual
Steven Brooks  As an Individual
Rajib Dash  As an Individual
Miguel Avila  As an Individual
Mohamed Shukby  As an Individual
Eric Mills  As an Individual
Faisal Bhabha  As an Individual
Chaitanya Kalevar  As an Individual
David Henderson  As an Individual
Dimitre Popov  As an Individual

7:40 p.m.

As an Individual

Dimitre Popov

Okay. Is it a way to get rid of me? I'll make another argument.

The government isn't willing to legislate a law allowing the law enforcement authorities to conduct Breathalyzer checks because of a concern about a charter infringement, which is sacrificing the lives of 1,000 Canadians every year. The question would be, on what grounds have you created and enacted Bill C-51 when there is only one victim and that, not to mention that the number of people, as a consequence of how Bill C-51 is enforced, sacrificed is much bigger?

I would like to mention as well whether you're aware of how many people die every year as a result of hospital errors. You don't know, or probably you won't tell me, but it's about 24,000 people. What is the government doing if the government is concerned for public safety?

7:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant

All right. I think we've understood your point.

I would remind the group tonight that our job is to get your comments, which we have been doing. Our job is to listen to your concerns, and I hope you will see yourselves reflected in our witness testimony. Our committee will be considering that as we present our advice to the government on the changes that we hear about from Canadians across the country.

I thank you for your time tonight, I thank you for your energy, and I thank you for the passion that you've brought to the subject. I want to acknowledge that there are people here from Windsor and from Oshawa, and people who spoke from Niagara Falls, from Hamilton, and from Mount Hope. This was in the GTA, but we also attracted people from around the GTA, and that goes into our considerations as well.

Thank you very much for your time. I encourage you to submit to the website for the public safety committee any thoughts or concerns you have. I wish you a safe trip home. Thank you.

The meeting is adjourned.