If you have a very large organization, as I said before, and if you really have a huge budget and you centralize all this oversight in one place, then it might work, but I don't see that being too likely. What we're going to have with this committee will be like the committee you have right now exactly, except with the security clearances that allow you to look into more confidential national security matters with the restrictions I spoke about before. You'll have your work cut out for you. This is huge. Just overseeing CSE is very difficult, and the CSE commissioner has a really hard time overseeing CSE.
If you have to look at 10, 15, or 20 organizations that are the backbone or infrastructure of national security in Canada, then I don't see that as being possible. What's going to happen is that it's going to look a bit like it is in Great Britain, where you have parliamentary oversight and a parliamentary committee looks at budget questions in depth across the board for different organizations, but it really doesn't do a thorough oversight of everything. It picks and chooses certain things that are important in the media or things that have caused some public attention. Exactly how the committee decides what it's going to look at, I'm not sure, but it's more like a standing inquiry commission that looks at four, five, or six different topics every year and not the 600, 700, or 800 different programs that we're proposing here.