I think we generally support the proposal of having a committee of parliamentarians. Where we see some danger is in creating something that's toothless and in which the public is not going to have any confidence. That's not necessarily going to make the situation any better; you're just going to have an additional layer. I can see some problems there.
In terms of your previous question to Mr. Fadden with respect to the legislative questions, I would point out that there is an entire body of legal interpretations that are secret and upon which the agencies are relying. A good example of that would be in the recent decision from Justice Noël, where we learned that there were internal interpretations that were secret of what metadata is and how that can be dealt with. What this committee might think it's legislating about and what the agencies are actually interpreting that legislation as, or how they are applying that legislation, are often two very different things.