Yes, I think so. It's one of the reasons why I think the relationship between the review bodies and the committee needs to be clarified. I think there's something to be said for the committee of parliamentarians to have the authority to mandate SIRC, for example, to do a review on behalf of the committee. In duplicating all these detailed reviews, at one level I can understand the value, because you bring a slightly different perspectives to bear, but I think we should have some pity on the bodies that are being reviewed. At some point, there's going to be too much.
Whatever can be said about SIRC, they're very good at getting a grip on what's going on in detail. I would argue that it would be worth considering having them do these reviews on behalf of the committee of parliamentarians.