All the access rules would apply, but I think the way the clause is worded poses a problem. In fact, it makes it possible to refuse the disclosure of the file in full, which means that if a document contains a single reference to information that must be protected, the entire document would be protected.
In the current Access to Information Act, one very specific section gives institutions an obligation to separate information within a document, which is why when we make access to information requests, we receive partially redacted documents. I think clause 35 is worded in such a way that, depending on the nature of the secretariat's work, no information will be disclosed.