Perhaps I can add to Mr. Sapers' answer.
There is an executive committee, and everybody has roles and responsibilities. Part of the issue is that if you make every member of the executive committee responsible to some degree to look after aboriginal issues, nobody ends up being accountable. This is why I think it's important to have a single person who can be accountable. When there are decisions about funding, about programming, about health care services, and when there are decisions in terms of where you will put the program and how you will structure your organization, you can have a constant voice at the table who looks at things through an aboriginal lens—e.g. with more than 25% of our inmate population being from an indigenous background, these will be the kinds of impacts you will have—and who then looks after those performance outcomes that Mr. Sapers mentioned to ensure that gaps do narrow over time.