I fully get that, because it's not necessary for the general public to have that information. My concern was around the committee having that information, going through the process of redaction and who's doing what and advising whom on what.
December 6th, 2016 / 3:55 p.m.
Conservative
Dianne Lynn Watts Conservative South Surrey—White Rock, BC
I fully get that, because it's not necessary for the general public to have that information. My concern was around the committee having that information, going through the process of redaction and who's doing what and advising whom on what.
See context to find out what was said next.