Michel Picard at the Public Safety and National Security Committee

On February 6th, 2017. See this statement in context.

February 6th, 2017 / 3:40 p.m.

Liberal

Michel Picard Liberal Montarville, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Mr. Blaney, it's a pleasure to have you with us again today.

First, I would like to congratulate you and the others here today on your efforts toward preventive measures to save lives. I don't think there's any justification for doing otherwise. Your bill is expanded and developed. Having said that, I would like some clarification for myself and the committee.

For example, clause 320.14(1)(b) indicates that your bill proposes to eliminate the last drink defence. The 2012 Supreme Court decision in St-Onge Lamoureux can be mentioned here.

Could you please explain the last drink defence and how your bill is akin to the Supreme Court's comments in this respect?

See context to find out what was said next.