So it's persons who are authorized by the host party, in the course of the normal certification and recertification process, in consultation with the inspecting party. If you look at that on its face, it's not actually that we're giving the U.S. a veto over Canadian hiring practices or pre-clearance. As you point out, if you take at face value the statement that our system is better, we're not obligated to take the U.S. information into account or to change our mind on a pre-clearance decision on the basis of what you call “derogatory information”.
On May 29th, 2017. See this statement in context.