Chair, obviously the ability of a traveller to leave the pre-clearance zone in the way that they can under the current framework is something that's been part of this debate. We recognize what the agreement says, and whether or not the amendment will receive support from members of the government caucus strictly on that basis, nonetheless it's worth presenting.
Again, one of the most egregious elements is this inability for someone who might feel that there's an abusive line of questioning, or any such legitimate reason, to choose to leave, and the obligations that are placed on them.
This is the first of a few amendments that will seek to alleviate that burden on travellers who have legitimate reasons for leaving.