I would say that a combination of factors led to the bill being introduced. The facts surrounding the Joël-Denis Bellavance spying case, which had nothing to do with the Chamberland commission, also played a part.
What's more, I can't remember whether you were the one who taught us about this case, but I would point to the Supreme Court's decision in Keable, in 1978. It had to do with the province's authority to establish a commission of inquiry into a matter under federal jurisdiction. In this case, we are clearly talking about a federal matter. With all due respect to the Chamberland commission, it doesn't have the authority to take action in an area under federal jurisdiction. It is therefore up to us, in Canada's Parliament, to address the issue pursuant to our authority under the Constitution and Criminal Code. They can intervene—