I can talk about it because some of our journalists are testifying before the Chamberland Commission. I don't see any incompatibility between this bill and the commission's work. There's simply the fact that Radio-Canada has journalists working in Canada's 10 provinces, whereas the Chamberland Commission hearings concern the work of journalists in Quebec.
From the start, we've always wanted the Chamberland Commission's work to explore what occurs when warrants are obtained rather than focus on the journalists' work. We must see what improvements can be made when it comes to obtaining these warrants, whether the warrants are issued by justices of the peace or by superior court justices, as proposed in the bill. There's the whole issue of an individual's involvement in politics and how this influenced the police. The cases being studied by the commission typically concern these issues.
We also certainly want to set guidelines for certain things, as the bill proposes. These include the type of evidence needed to obtain surveillance warrants and the criteria that must be met. We're confident that the commission will look at this. According to the testimony we've heard, the commission's work seems very broad and concerns all the factors that affect these issues.