Thank you, Chair.
First of all, I thank you for being here. After hearing that last comment and reading your letter, that's the real issue, then, isn't it? It's the fact that one of the stated objectives is the enforcement of different government programs and, given the uniqueness of this situation, much of that exit information can be very much misconstrued given this reality that you've been explaining for the last number of minutes.
As we look beyond the problem and towards solutions, perhaps we could get your thoughts on some of the potential solutions to the problems created by this. For example, would having more formal redress systems be a good example of something to look at as a way to alleviate this? Here's what I mean by that. Let's say there's no entry information when you return to Quebec. The information might be erroneous or mistakes can be made. We see this in our constituency offices all the time. A well-intentioned public servant might tag a certain piece of exit information and not look at the whole picture of the patterns that are there in terms of your exit.
Would being able to contest that formally be one mechanism that you envisage as something to alleviate the problem you're highlighting today?